Ecosystem
Transformation
ISSN 2619-0931 Online
  • About
    • About the journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Publication Ethics
    • News
  • Editorial Policy
    • Our Mission
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing
    • Open Access
    • Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Policy
    • Manuscript Processing Charges
    • Retracting a publication
    • Archiving
    • Plagiarism detection
    • Preprint and postprint Policy
  • Authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • License Agreement
    • Copyright Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Manuscript Submission
  • Reviewers
    • Guidelines for reviewers
    • Peer Review Form
  • Publications
    • Current issue
    • Archived Issues
    • First online
    • Authors
  • Contacts
  • About
    • About the journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Publication Ethics
    • News
  • Editorial Policy
    • Our Mission
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing
    • Open Access
    • Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Policy
    • Manuscript Processing Charges
    • Retracting a publication
    • Archiving
    • Plagiarism detection
    • Preprint and postprint Policy
  • Authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • License Agreement
    • Copyright Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Manuscript Submission
  • Reviewers
    • Guidelines for reviewers
    • Peer Review Form
  • Publications
    • Current issue
    • Archived Issues
    • First online
    • Authors
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Журналы
  • Архив
  • 2022
  • Ecosystem transformation Volume 5 No 3 (2022)
Current issue Archived Issues First online Authors
  • English version

2022 Ecosystem Transformation 5 (3), 3–13

The procedure for selecting bioassays for different types of pollution

Olkova A.S.  

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23859/estr-220324
Volume: 5
Number: 3
Pages: 3–13
Received: 24.03.2022
Accepted: 11.05.2022
Available online: 19.08.2022
Published: 15.09.2022
ISSN 2619-0931 Online
Download 0.99 Mb
  • Abstract
  • About authors
  • References

The algorithm is suggested for selecting most appropriate and sensitive bioassay method to a particular type of pollution prevailing in the study area. The algorithm bases on a battery of bioassays, which necessarily includes mortality test for Daphnia magna Straus, 1820. Other approaches for comparing sensitivity of methods are selected for particular aim. The algorithm has been tested in model and for in situ samples. According to the proposed algorithm, the mortality tests for D. magna and Ceriodaphnia affinis Lilljeborg, 1900 are enough informative to assess the pollution by mineral nitrogen compounds. When prevailing contamination are mineral salts of Cu, phosphates, and pyrophosphates, a bioluminescent test with Escherichia coli Migula, 1895 has the maximum sensitivity. If the aquatic environment is polluted by Cd, Pb, Zn, oil products, organic herbicides imazetapir and imazamox, chemotactic response reduction test with Paramecium caudatum Ehrenberg, 1838 is the most sensitive. The proposed algorithm is general, but it should only be used when the prevailing contaminant is known, and its effects predominate over the effects of other compounds in the sample.

A. S. Olkova
Vyatka State University
ul. Moskovskaya 36, Kirov, 610000 Russia

morgan-abend@mail.ru

Altenburger, R., Scholze, M., Busch, W., Escher, B., Jakobs, G. et al., 2018. Mixture effects in samples of multiple contaminants – An inter-laboratory study with manifold bioassays. Environment International 114, 95–106. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.013
Animal models in toxicology, 2016. Gad, S.C. (ed.).CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 1152 p.
Blais, J.M., Rosen, M.R., Smol, J.P. (eds.), 2015. Environmental contaminants: using natural archives to track sources and long-term trends of pollution (Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research. Vol. 18). Springer, Netherlands, 509 p. http://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9541-8
Brennan, J.C., Gale, R.W., Alvarez, D.A., Berninger, J.P., Leet, J.K. et al., 2020. Factors affecting sampling strategies for design of an effects-directed analysis for endocrine-active chemicals. Environmental toxicology and chemistry
39 (7), 1309–1324. http://www.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4739
Castillo, G., Schafer, L., 2000. Evaluation of a bioassay battery for water toxicity testing: A Chilean experience. Environmental toxicology 15(4), 331–337. http://www.doi.org/10.1002/1522-7278(2000)15:4<331::AID-TOX9>3.0.CO;2-E
Chapman, E.E.V., Hemer, S.H., Dave, G.,Murimboh, J.D., 2012. Utility of bioassays (lettuce,red clover, red fescue, Microtox, MetSTICK, Hyalella, bait lamina) in ecological risk screening of acid metal (Zn) contaminated soil. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 80, 161–171. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.02.025
De Baat, M.L., Kraak, M.H.S., Van der Oost, R., De Voogt, P., Verdonschot, P.F.M., 2019. Effect-based nationwide surface water quality assessment to identify ecotoxicological risks. Water research 159, 434–443. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.040
Fokina, A.I., Domracheva, L.I., Olkova, A.S., Skugoreva, S.G., Lyalina, E.I., Berezin, G.I., Darovskikh, L.V., 2016. Issledovaniye toksichnosti prob urbanozemov, zagryaznennykh tyazhelymi metallami [Studies of the toxicity of samples of urbanozems contaminated with heavy metals]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences] 18 (2 (2)), 544–550. (In Russian).
Gupta, P.K., 2016. Fundamentals of toxicology: essential concepts and applications. Academic Press, London, UK, 398 p. Kondakova, L.V., Domracheva, L.I., Ogorodnikova, S. Yu., Kudryashov, N.A., Olkova, A.S., Ashikhmina, T.Ya., 2014. Bioindikatsionnyye i biotestovyye reaktsii organizmov na deystviye metilfosfonatov i pirofosfata natriya [Bioindication
and bioassay reactions of organisms to action of methylphosphonates and sodium pyrophosphate]. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya [Theoretical and Applied Ecology] 4, 63–69. (In Russian).
Morisseau, C., Merzlikin, O., Lin, A., He, G.C., Feng, W. et al., 2009. Toxicology in the fast lane: application of high-throughput bioassays to detect modulation of key enzymes and receptors. Environmental health perspectives 117 (12), 1867–1872. http://www.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900834
Nikinmaa, M., 2014. An introduction to aquatic toxicology. Academic Press, London, UK, 252 p. Oberleitner, D., Stutz, L., Schulz, W.G., Bergmann, A., Achten, C., 2020. Seasonal performance assessment of four riverbank filtration
sites by combined non-target and effect-directed analysis. Сhemosphere 261, 127706. http://www.
doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127706
Olkova, A.S., 2020. Razrabotka strategii biotestirovaniya vodnykh sred s uchetom mnogofaktornosti otvetnykh reaktsiy testorganizmov [Development of a strategy for bioassay of aquatic environments, taking into account the multifactorial response of test organisms]. Biological Sciences Doctor of Science thesis. Vladimir, Russia, 358 p. (In Russian).
Olkova, A.S., Berezin, G.I., 2019. Issledovaniye chuvstvitel’nosti attestovannykh biotestov k zagryazneniyu vod sovremennymi gerbitsidami: model’nyye eksperimenty [Study of the sensitivity of certified bioassays to water pollution by modern herbicides: model experiments]. Voda i ekologiya: problemy i resheniya [Water and Ecology: Problems
and Solutions] 2 (78), 111–119. (In Russian). http://www.doi.org/10.23968/2305-3488.2019.24.2.111-119
Olkova, A.S., Makhanova, E.V., 2018. Vybor biotestov dlya ekologicheskikh issledovaniy vod, zagryaznennykh mineral’nymi formami azota [Choice of bioassays for ecological studies of waters polluted with mineral forms of nitrogen]. Voda i ekologiya: problemy i resheniya [Water and Ecology: Problems and Solutions] 4 (76), 70–81.
(In Russian). http://www.doi.org/10.23968/2305-3488.2018.23.4.70-81
Olkova, A.S., Zimonina, N.M., Lyalina, E.I., Bobretsova, V.R., 2017. Diagnostika lokal’nogo zagryazneniya urbanozemov v rayonakh avtozapravochnykh stantsiy [Testing of local pollution of urbanozems in the areas of gas
stations]. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya [Theoretical and Applied Ecology] 1, 56–62. (In Russian).
Pandey, L.K., Lavoie, I., Morin, S., Depuydt, S., Lyu, J. et al., 2019. Towards a multi-bioassaybased index for toxicity assessment of fluvial waters. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191 (2), 112. http://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7234-5
Ramezanpoor, M., Salehian, H., Babanezhad, E., Rezvani, M., 2021. The leaching of atrazine and plant species sensitivity to atrazine using bioassays and chemical analyses. Soil and Sediment Contamination 31 (4), 456–467. http://www.doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2021.1963667
Schuijt, L.M., Peng, F.J., van den Berg, S.J.P., Dingemans, M.M.L., Van den Brink, P.J., 2021. (Eco)toxicological tests for assessing impacts of chemical stress to aquatic ecosystems: Facts, challenges, and future. Science of the
Total Environment 795, 148776. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148776
Van den Berg, S.J.P., Maltby, L., Sinclair, T., Liang,R.Y., van den Brink,P.J., 2021. Cross-species extrapolation of chemical sensitivity. Science of the Total Environment 753, 141800. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141800
Wieczerzak, M., Namiesnik, J., Kudlak, B., 2016. Bioassays as one of the Green Chemistry tools for assessing environmental quality: A review. Environment International 94, 341–361. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.017
Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Zhu, L.S., Wang, J.H.,
Wang, J., Zhou, T., 2017. The acute toxic effects
of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate ionic
liquids on Chlorella vulgaris and Daphnia magna.
Environmental Pollution 229, 887–895. http://www.
doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.055

Keywords: bioassay methodology, selection of bioassays, test organism, pollution sensitivity, prevailing pollution, environmental monitoring

For citation: Olkova, A.S., 2022. The procedure for selecting bioassays for different types of pollution. Ecosystem Transformation 5 (3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.23859/estr-220324

About About the journal Editorial Team Publication Ethics News
Editorial Policy Our Mission Peer Review Process Publication Ethics Indexing Open Access Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Policy Manuscript Processing Charges Retracting a publication Archiving Plagiarism detection Preprint and postprint Policy
Authors Instructions for authors License Agreement Copyright Notice Privacy Policy Manuscript Submission
Reviewers Guidelines for reviewers Peer Review Form
Publications Current issue Archived Issues First online Authors
Contacts

2026 Ecosystem transformation
Cherepovets State University

ISSN 2619-0931 Online


Creative Commons License
Content is available under license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Journal "Ecosystem transformation"/"Трансформация экосистем" is registered in the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) in Match 20, 2018. Registration certificate ПИ № ФС 77-72506.

0